Different training ideologies in animal training emphasize varying degrees of positivity, compulsion, and motivation. I personally am balanced, LIMA leaning. Here’s a brief overview of what that means and some other common approaches.
Purely positive/force free: This method relies solely on rewards and positive reinforcement to shape behavior. It avoids any form of correction, punishment or compulsion, aiming to build trust and cooperation between the animal and trainer through only positive means.
LIMA (Least Intrusive, Minimally Aversive): This methodology prioritizes using the least intrusive and least aversive methods possible to achieve training goals. It emphasizes understanding the animal’s individual needs and preferences, and incorporating positive reinforcement whenever possible.
Balanced training: This approach incorporates both positive reinforcement and corrective techniques, such as leash corrections or withholding rewards. The emphasis remains on positive methods, but balanced trainers believe fairly addressing unwanted behaviors is also necessary.
Compulsion training: This method emphasizes achieving desired behaviors primarily through strict obedience and corrections. While compulsion can be very effective, it generally also leads to an increase in anxiety and stress over time. Compulsion training prioritizes results over a positive experience for the animal.
The choice of training ideology depends on various factors, including the animal’s species, individual temperament, and the desired training outcomes. For any species, it’s important to prioritize the animal’s welfare and well being when choosing a training approach, but it’s also important to train the animal in front of you and keep everyone safe.
